A Randomized Comparative Study of the Use of Individual Modality and Combination of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy (DSOC) for Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures.

Background: To determine the superiority of the combination of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) in the same sitting over the individual modality alone in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures. Materials and Methods: A randomized study enrolled 60 adult patients with biliary strictures who were randomized into two groups: ERCP + DSOC and ERCP/DSOC. Histopathologic or cytologic assessment was performed in terms of benign, indeterminate, or malignant nature of the strictures. Procedural adverse events were documented. Accuracy in terms of sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), and predictive value [positive (PPV) and negative (NPV)] were noted. Results: As per final diagnosis, in ERCP/DSOC group, there were 12 (40%) benign cases and 18 (60%) malignant cases, and in group ERCP + DSOC, there were 8 (26.67%) benign cases and 22 (73.33%) malignant cases. ERCP/DSOC labeled 16 (53.33%) patients as benign, 8 (26.67%) as malignant, and 6 (20%) as indeterminate, while ERCP + DSOC labeled 8 (26.67%) as benign, 17 (56.67%) as malignant, and 5 (16.67%) as indeterminate. The Sn, Sp, PPV, and NPV of ERCP/DSOC were 44.4%, 75%, 100%, and 56.25%, and for ERCP + DSOC was 77.27%, 62.50%, 100%, and 62.5%, respectively (P = 0.033). Side effects were statistically similar in both the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: To conclude, the combination of ERCP with DSOC is safe and effective with higher diagnostic sensitivity (77.27%) in comparison to standard ERCP or DSOC alone (44.4%) for the diagnosis of biliary strictures.

Effect of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedures: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center From Eastern India.

Background To contain the spread of infection and reduce the burden on healthcare infrastructure, many countries globally adopted a lockdown strategy during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Hospitals were converted to dedicated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) centers, and non-COVID-19 patients were intervened on a triage basis. During this time, only emergency procedures were performed. The impact of this lockdown strategy during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on various gastrointestinal endoscopy interventions remains unknown. Methodology In this retrospective, observational study conducted in the Department of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar from March 25 to September 30, 2020, data related to clinical profile, indication, and endoscopic interventions performed in reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-negative patients with the use of personal protective kits were analyzed and compared with the historical controls. Results A total of 2,282 patients were admitted and 422 endoscopic procedures were performed during the six-month study period with an intervention rate of 18.49%. The most common procedure was upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (228, 58.13%), followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (88, 22.50%). Chronic liver disease (CLD) (144 patients) followed by malignancy (111 patients) were the most common diagnosis. During the first phase of the lockdown (March to May), only 52 procedures were performed (52 vs. 506). None of the patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound. In 2019, 4,501 patients were admitted and 1,224 procedures were performed with an intervention rate of 27.19 (p < 0.0001). None of the staff of the Department of Gastroenterology developed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during this period. Conclusions There was a significant drop in endoscopic procedures during the lockdown and most of the esophagoduodenoscopy procedures were done for CLD and ERCP for biliary tract malignancy. Endoscopic procedures done on RT-PCR for COVID-19-negative patients were safe using personal protective kits.

Serum Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase-to-Platelet Ratio as a Noninvasive Marker of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B.

Background The gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)-to-platelet ratio (GPR) is identified as a new model for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of GPR for the prediction of liver fibrosis in patients with CHB. Methods In an observational cohort study, patients with CHB were enrolled. The diagnostic performance of GPR was compared with transient elastography (TE), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) scores for the prediction of liver fibrosis using liver histology as a gold standard. Results Forty-eight patients with CHB with a mean age of 33.42 ± 15.72 years were enrolled. Liver histology showed meta-analysis of histological data in viral hepatitis (METAVIR) stage F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4 fibrosis in 11, 12, 11, seven, and seven patients, respectively. The Spearman correlation of METAVIR fibrosis stage with APRI, FIB-4, GPR, and TE were 0.354, 0.402, 0.551, and 0.726, respectively (P value < 0.05). TE had the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) (80%, 83%, 83%, and 79%, respectively), followed by GPR (76%, 65%, 70%, and 71%, respectively) for predicting significant fibrosis (≥F2). However, TE had comparable sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV with GPR (86%, 82%, 42%, and 93%, and 86%, 71%, 42%, and 92%, respectively) for predicting extensive fibrosis (≥F3). Conclusion The performance of GPR is comparable to TE in predicting significant and extensive liver fibrosis. GPR may be an acceptable, low-cost alternative for predicting compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) (F3-F4) in CHB patients.

Addition of Nitazoxanide to Standard Clarithromycin Based Triple Therapy for 2 Weeks Effectively Eradicates Treatment-Naive Helicobacter Pylori Infection. A Single Centre prospective, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) led to reduced success with traditional H. pylori treatments. This warrants further evaluation of other treatment options. One such treatment regimen of interest is nitazoxanide containing regimen. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the addition of nitazoxanide to clarithromycin-based triple therapy in patients with H. pylori infection. METHODS: In this single-center prospective observational trial, patients with H. pylori infection were treated with a regimen comprising of nitazoxanide 1000 mg, amoxicillin 2000 mg, clarithromycin 1000 mg, and esomeprazole 80 mg per day (NACE regimen) for14 days. Eradication of H. pylori infection was assessed 4 weeks after completion of therapy by using stool antigen assay. Treatment compliance and adverse effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 111 patients who entered into the study for final analysis, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 93.7% (104 out of 111) patients in per-protocol analysis and 90.4% (104 out of 115) patients in intention to treat analysis. The treatment regimen was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The addition of nitazoxanide to standard clarithromycin-based triple therapy effectively eradicates H. pylori infection. This regimen is safe and well tolerated.

Evaluation of factors associated with complications in amoebic liver abscess in a predominantly toddy-drinking population: A retrospective study of 198 cases.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although the mortality rate has declined in recent years, amoebic liver abscesses (ALAs) still carry a substantial risk of morbidity. Studies regarding the indicators of severity, complication, or prognosis of ALA are limited in number and heterogeneous in methodology and results. METHODS: Clinicodemographic profile, therapeutic modalities, and outcomes of indoor ALA patients admitted between January 2016 and October 2017 were analyzed. An analysis of possible prognostic factors associated with complications and interventional therapy in patients with ALA was performed retrospectively. RESULTS: Data of 198 patients with ALA (mean age: 45 ± 12.1; M:F ratio: 193:5) were analyzed. The volume of abscess (503.1 ± 391.2: 300.2 ± 305.8 mL), elevated liver enzymes, and duration of hospital stay (11.98 ± 5.75): 10.23 ± 4.1 days) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in alcoholic, compared to nonalcoholic, individuals. On univariate analysis, older age, duration of alcohol consumption, smoking, leukocytosis, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, and a larger volume of abscess were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) associated with complications. On multivariate analysis, older age, duration of alcohol consumption, smoking, leukocytosis, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyponatremia were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) associated with complications. Male gender, hypoalbuminemia, and larger volume of abscess were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with interventional treatment. CONCLUSION: Older age, leukocytosis, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, chronic alcoholism, and smoking are independent factors significantly associated with complications in patients with ALA. Hypoalbuminemia, larger volume of abscess, and male gender are independent variables associated with the requirement of interventional therapy.

Addition of Somatostatin After Successful Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Does not Prevent Early Rebleeding in Comparison to Placebo: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of endoscopic sclerotherapy in controlling acute variceal bleeding is significantly improved when vasoactive drug is added. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is superior to sclerotherapy. Whether efficacy of EVL will also improve with addition of somatostatin is not known. We compared EVL plus somatostatin versus EVL plus placebo in control of acute variceal bleeding. METHODS: Consecutive cirrhotic patients with acute esophageal variceal bleeding were enrolled. After emergency EVL, patients were randomized to receive either somatostatin (250 mcg/hr) or placebo infusion. Primary endpoint was treatment failure within 5 days. Treatment failure was defined as fresh hematemesis ≥2 h after start of therapy, or a 3 gm drop in Hb, or death. RESULTS: 61 patients were enrolled (EVL plus somatostatin group, n = 31 and EVL plus placebo group, n = 30). The baseline characteristics were similar. Within the initial 5-day period, the frequency of treatment failure was similar in both the groups (EVL plus somatostatin group 8/31 [26%] versus EVL plus placebo group 7/30 [23%]; P = 1.000). The mortality was also similar in the two groups (3/31 [10%] vs. 3/30 [10%]; P = 1.000). Baseline HVPG ≥19 mm Hg and active bleeding at index endoscopy were independent predictors of treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of somatostatin infusion to EVL therapy does not offer any advantage in control of acute variceal bleeding or reducing mortality. The reason for this may be its failure to maintain sustained reduction in portal pressure for five days. Active bleeding at index endoscopy and high baseline HVPG should help choose early alternative treatment options. Trial registered with ClincalTrials.gov vide NCT01267669.

A prospective randomized comparative study of monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate and photoselective vaporization of the prostate in patients who present with benign prostatic obstruction: a single center experience.

PURPOSE: The first prospective randomized study to compare the safety and short-term efficacy of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), bipolar TURP, and photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using GreenLight high-performance system 120W laser in patients who presented with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 186 consecutive patients who presented with BPO and who were planned for surgery were randomized into three groups: Group A, patients who underwent monopolar TURP; group B, patients who underwent bipolar TURP; and group C, patients who underwent PVP. All three groups were subdivided into two subgroups based on prostate volume: Subgroup 1 >20 cc and <50 cc, and subgroup 2, between 50 and 80 cc. Patients preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the three groups and subgroups 1 and 2 were comparable. The number of patients in whom postoperative irrigation was instituted, amount of fluid used for postoperative irrigation, duration of postoperative irrigation, postoperative hemoglobin concentration, and duration of catheterization were significantly in favor of group C patients except for the mean operative time, which was significantly longer among them. All three groups demonstrated an increase in International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, and maximum flow rate and decrease in prostate volume and postvoid residual urine at 12-month follow-up. The mean Intgernational Index of Erectile Function-5 score did not show improvement in any group. The need for blood transfusion and clot retention necessitating intervention were significantly lower among group C patients compared with group A, whereas these values for group B patients did not reach significant level compared with either group A or C. These complications were comparable among subgroup 1 patients, whereas subgroup 2 patients had shown results in favor of subgroup C2. CONCLUSION: Monopolar TURP, bipolar TURP, and PVP are equally efficacious at 12-month follow-up. PVP has added advantages of lesser blood loss, lesser need for blood transfusion (especially for prostate volume 50-80 cc), and shorter catheterization time.